MoMusings

Random ramblings and musings about all things malware and related net-nasties...

Monday, 30 July 2007

Excel-lent Spam

I mentioned in my 'Experiments in Spam' posting the following: "On the spam front there have been a couple of new developments, but that's another posting." Well, this is the posting which will cover the latest tricks being used by the spammers to try and get past any anti-spam defenses you have in place.

The spammers are actively trying out different files formats, we've seen image spam [.gif, .jpg, .bmp, .png] Microsoft Word document spam [.doc, .dot], Adobe Acrobat spam [.pdf] and recently we've started to see several new file formats being targeted, so let me now cover what's new.

Take a look at this first screen-shot, can you guess what file format is being used by the spammers here?



You all recognise it don't you? Yes, it is a spreadsheet, or more specifically it is a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet, so the spammers are now using .xls format as well now to get their 'crud' into your inboxes.

Now, look at the next screen-shot and you will notice that the e-mail shown in it has a file attachment, in this case it is a ZIP file, can you guess what's in it?



No, not malware, although using ZIP files is a common way for the malware authors to send their creations to you, sometimes even using password protected [encrypted] ZIPs to get past anti-malware defenses.

The final screen-shot [below] gives the game away, does it look familiar?



Yes, it is an Microsoft Excel spreadsheet again.

Both of these XLS spam screenshots show 'Pump-n-Dump' stock spam/scams.

So far the spammers using the file formats, especially the Microsoft ones used by Word and Excel, have refrained from including malicious content [executables], macros and web links to malicious content or booby-trapped web sites containing exploit code. This won't last.

So, what can we expect next from the spammers?

  • More compression and packing tools to be used.

  • More common file formats to be used.

  • Embedded web links leading to malware files or exploits.

  • Embedded executable files or malicious scripts/macros or exploits.

If you see any other interesting new tricks/techniques or file formats being used by spammers then please feel free to send me the details or post the information as a comment. Thanks!

Labels: ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Friday, 27 July 2007

Asked By A Reader...

The following question was asked by a reader of this blog, and I informed the reader that as it was a good question and that the answer is quite involved, that I'd cover it later as a separate blog entry, so here we go.

Here's the question:

"Since you are discussing Spam I will ask a question that I've had for some time. Why can't email vendors (google, AOL, MSN, etc.) setup on one of their gateways to return emails as undeliverable, if their customer puts the mail in a Spam folder. Won't that result in the Spammer removing the email from their distribution list after a few undeliverable messages?"

And here's the answer:

Nice idea, if the vast majority of spammers:

  • Didn't fake [spoof] the address that the e-mail appears to be from, so the real spammer rarely sees any bounces as all bounced mail ends up going to the e-mail address that the spammers stole, this type of attack is known as a 'Joe Job'. In some cases this is intentional to try and discredit a company or individual.

  • Didn't totally ignore unsubscribe requests, in fact this only makes the e-mail address you try and unsubscribe more valuable to the spammers as it means it is active. You will get more, not less spam if you insist on using them.

  • Weren't criminals using botnets to send 90 percent of their 'crud' and as these criminals are using computers that they have infected with malware to allow them to send their 'crud' through, they have little to fear from their own ISPs.

  • So, the bottom line is, nice idea, but it is completely unworkable using the current SMTP standards. SMTP2 anyone?

A quick update on my latest anti-spam experiment:

Since my last posting I've received just 12 spam/malware e-mails which managed to sidestep the new defences. To put this in context , before I put these new techniques in place I usually received around 1,000 e-mails a day, of those about 90 percent was spam, so instead of around 900 spam e-mails a day, I'm now getting about 6!

So, does anyone have any other questions they would like me to try and answer, or have anything to say about this one?

* I'll cover this in detail in another posting.

Labels: , , , , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Wednesday, 25 July 2007

Experiments In Spam

No. This doesn't mean I've been dabbling in creating or sending spam...Quite the opposite, in fact.

Last night I took a step into the unknown, I made major changes to the way I deal with spam arriving at my personal mail server. Why?

Well, at the moment I use a mix of Bayesian filtering, custom filtering rules and a DNS Blacklist to tag known spam. This works well, as I still get to see the spam so that I can analyse it, generate statistics, etc. which I use for trend analysis, in reports [such as my Monthly Malware Reviews], presentations and so on.

However, I just don't have the spare capacity to manage this at the moment as I have other commitments that need to be given 90 percent or more of my time so that I can complete them.

To this end I thought I'd try a different approach to spam.

What I put in place last night are a number of techniques which I'm using to no longer just flag [tag with custom headers] spam [so they can be filtered out and analysed later]. Instead I'm actively rejecting it at my mail server using a mixture of custom Content Control/Compliance rules, DNS blacklists [such as Spamhaus and Spamcop], and Graylisting.

My Bayesian classifier will still be used to deal with anything that gets through. I estimate that using Graylisting and aggressive DNS blacklisting will drop the amount of spam I have to process down to around 10 percent, rather than the 90 percent it stands at now, as you can see from the following graph:



Early results seem to confirm my estimates, as overnight my usual haul of spam* has dropped from the typical 400-600 to just 12, quite an effect!

Furthermore it appears from these early results that several spammers, scammers and malware authors have already adapted their tools/techniques to handle Graylisting. This can be seen as instead of the mail being sent, being rejected [temporarily], and never being seen again [as happens with most spam/scams/malware distributed via e-mail]. The 'Bad Guys and Girls' appear to have added a 'retry' feature to enable them to slip past Graylisting as if they were a real 'mail server' which fully supports the relevant RFCs [SMTP standards].

To check this, I have investigated the raw e-mail headers and I can confirm that not one of these 'spammy' e-mails that managed to get past the Graylisting tool used a third party MX, they ALL came directly from the infected [bot controlled] system or spammers own system, usually a DSL connected PC.

So, it looks like Graylisting may only be useful for a while, as usual I suspect it will be my usual approach that will cope best, this being Defence in Depth.

No doubt I'll make some changes to the current configuration, tweaking it, maybe adding/removing things, either way, I'll keep you posted...In the meantime, a question for you:
"How do you deal with spam?"

On the spam front there have been a couple of new developments, but that's another posting ;-)

* In this case spam refers to not only UCE [Unsolicited Commercial E-mail], but also Malware and Scams [Phishing and 419s] too.

Labels: , , , , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Tuesday, 24 July 2007

Articles and Book Reviews

You might remember that I had been writing a number of articles for the Virus Bulletin magazine and I mentioned that I'd let you all know when I would have copies available on my website, well now I do:

So, to refresh your memory, here's a snippet about the latest article which I mentioned in the 'Watch Out, Watch Out, There's an E-card About!' posting on the 3rd of July:

"In a rather 'twilight zone' moment, last month I wrote an article on the use of HTML based e-mail and the use of e-cards [fake ones] by the 'Bad Guys and Girls' for the Virus Bulletin magazine; this was before the latest attacks started....most spooky.

The article has just been published in the July issue, so no, the 'Bad Guys and Girls' didn't use the data and other information contained in the article I wrote for VB. I will make a copy of the article available early next month. Many thanks to VB for allowing me to do this."


Here's a link to the article: [PDF format]

The other article I recently wrote for 'Virus Bulletin' was a book review on a subject that I've both blogged about and written a paper on, this being: 'Bots and Botnets'. The book was recently published by Syngress and is the first [to the best of my knowledge] book which focusses on this area.

Here's a link to the book review I wrote: [PDF format]

If you want to add the book to your library or to see other reviews, then feel free to click on the relevant link below:



As usual all my other published articles and papers can be found here or here.

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Monday, 23 July 2007

June 2007 Malware Review

'Flaming June' has come and gone, however in the UK it wasn't 'Flaming' as in hot, it was instead 'Flaming Wet' as large parts of the UK suffered from flash or prolonged flooding for parts of the month.
We are now past the halfway point of 2007 and I'll include some comments on trends, etc. that have occurred during the first half of the year.

Once more on the malware and related security threats front it has been an interesting month with another load of malware using social-engineering to get the victim to infect their computer without the need for the malware author to have to code routines to automate infection. We've also seen lots of activity from scammers and cyber-criminals again, more on that later.

Like previous months, I will cover some statistics from my own sensors and compare those against those from a couple of major anti-virus companies, and finally I will cover new and interesting things that occurred during the month.

I have created some graphs and performed some trend analysis from the raw data from my WormCharmer and Bayesian filter. I have included four sources of information for the graphs and pie-charts, these are:


The last two are my own projects and all data is from the Internet, these systems are running on an aDSL link and are personal research projects that have been running for some time; WormCharmer 5 years, Malware Bayesian Filter 4 years.

In total I captured only 209 samples during June, which have been catalogued as 31 distinct families and variants. In comparison during May I captured 800 samples which were catalogued as 35 distinct families/variants. As you can see the captures in June are significantly down from May's total.

During June I captured and submitted no brand new malware strains/variants [unknown to all or most AV companies at the time of submission]. This is due to other work requiring my attention.

The June statistics further consolidate my view that the general trend is still downwards. It seems that social-engineering is still the technique of choice so far this year.

The first pie chart below shows the Top 10 distinct malware by percentage. Let us look at this in more detail:

During June I reported just 26 new Phishing sites which are now included in the Netcraft phishing site database used by the Netcraft anti-phishing toolbar which I blogged about some time ago.

The first pie chart below shows the Top 10 distinct malware by percentage. Let us look at this in more detail:



W32/Tenga.3666 [Frisk] has further consolidated the pole position it took back in April after having to settle for the runner-up position during March when W32.Kasper.A [aka MyWife.D] had forced its way to the top of the chart.

There are just four [down from five] members of the Opaserv.worm family in June's chart. These are variants: AE, D, I and AC in second, seventh, eighth and tenth places respectively.

The Netsky family is back in the top ten again after dropping out of the chart completely in May. We have a trio of family members in June's chart, these are: Q [aka P] back in at fourth place, Y back in in fifth and finally X back in at sixth place. Looks a bit like the London Bus affect, wait for ages for one to appear, and then three appear at the same time!

As with Netsky, we have one final re-entry in June's top ten, this being Zapchast which has managed to steal the final podium position coming back in to the third spot.

The final slot left is taken by Dupator, which is up one place from tenth to ninth.

If you compare the above to the data from Kaspersky and also the data from SOPHOS you may see some marked differences. Why? Well, simply my sample capture systems collect data from multiple 'vectors' and combine the data, so I tend to get a more rounded picture of what is really running round the Internet in the way of net nasties.

As you can see the top 10 from Kaspersky [below] for June once more has Mytob.c in seventh place which it managed to climb to back in February, it seems to have setup home there and put down roots!

Netsky.q [aka P] has climbed up from the runner-up spot it held in March and lost in April to snatch pole position in June's chart. It is joined by three other family members, these being: Netsky.t, February's pole sitter which slipped down to fourth during March and the pole sitter in first place in May, has fallen two places to occupy the final step of the podium; third place and to mirror that change, Netsky.aa, has gained two places, up from sixth to fourth place.

Bagle.gt has further reversed its slow journey down the chart, climbing back up the chart one more place from third to take the runner-up spot; second.

Worm.Win32.Feebs.gen has fallen back down one place from fifth to sixth effectively reversing its progress from May.

We have three new entries in June's chart, these are all members of the same family, this being Warezov. We have variant OZ straight in to the chart in fifth place, variant OV occupying the eight spot, and finally variant OP in ninth place.

To complete the top ten, we have a re-entry, this being an oldie; Mydoom-L which takes the final slot in tenth place.

Kaspersky had this to say about June's chart:

"After a long break, first place was again taken by the all-time leader of 2004 and 2005: the NetSky.q worm. Right on its heels is a worm from an equally old family, Bagle.gt. Meanwhile, NetSky.t, the leader in May, slipped very slightly down the table, ending up in third place.

Probably the most noteworthy event this month was the disappearance of May's rabble-rouser, Sober.aa. This virus appeared after a six-month stint in the shadows, suddenly taking fourth place before disappearing again. Will we be seeing this family in our reports again? I suspect not".



Please note: SOPHOS are now effectively only using family names for their top ten malware and because of this I will now use the same method for analysing their data.

In the SOPHOS chart we see a similar pattern; Netksy has regained its grip on pole position which it lost during May, and is back as the pole sitter. May's pole sitter, Sober, has once more dropped out of the top ten.

Mytob has managed to climb up the chart one place, to steal the runners-up place on the podium after being static in third place back in April and May.

The final step of the podium; third, is taken by a new entry which has only appeared in SOPHOS's web threat chart before. This new entry is Mal/Iframe.

Here is some commentary on it from Sophos:
"Interestingly, Mal/Iframe's appearance in the email-based chart demonstrates that it is not limited to only infecting via the web. Hackers can embed the malware into emails using HTML to exploit users".

Mydoom which was a re-entry in November's chart has recovered more ground during June after falling to seventh place in April and climbing to fifth in May, it is now up one more place to fourth.

November's new entry, Sality has reversed its slide down the chart, jumping up three places from effectively eighth place in May to fifth in June.

Zafi-D which dropped from February's fourth to sixth place in March and which reversed its slide down the chart, ending up in fifth place in April has now halted its slide, and is sitting in sixth place as it was in May.

Bagle is up a single place in June's chart from eighth to seventh place. Meanwhile Nyxem.D [aka MyWife] is likewise static in tenth place.

To complete the chart we have two re-entries, these are: Mal/DownLdr in eighth and W32/Stratio in ninth.



The final pie chart below shows the Top 10 malware families trapped by percentage. As you can see this includes not only mass-mailers but also share-crawling worms and bots.

This month the table is not headed up by the September 2005 leader, Tenga. Its crown has been stolen once more, this time by Opaserv. Tenga has been forced to accept the runners-up spot; second in June.

The final step of the podium, third place, has been occupied by Netsky which is up from the fifth place it held in May.

Zapchast which stormed up the chart from ninth to fifth place in February and managed to move up to fourth place in March then suffered a setback, slipping down to eighth place in April and to ninth in May, has experienced a major turn around, storming back up the chart and taking fourth place in June.

W32.Dupator has moved up one place in June from sixth to fifth place.

The rest of June's chart is made up by re-entries, these are: Tibs, Spaces, MyDoom, Small and finally Funlove, in sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth places respectively.




If you wish to see the current top 10, then see my external website at http://momusings.com. The data which feeds the WormCharmer stats is updated every 3 minutes 24 hours a day.

Please feel free to ask questions if you need any clarification on the data, the setup or whatever.

Now, let's switch to a different method: The following graph shows the percentage of malware that I received and my Bayesian Filtering tool classified correctly. You can see the data for the whole of the period of 2005 - 2007 [up to the end of June] here. This clearly shows that June was busier than May which was the quietest month since I started keeping these statistics. As shown in the figures for June, the overall trend is still downwards and we will continue to see less malware being seeded via e-mail although we may continue to see more malware being seeded via links in e-mails, rather than as attachments, such as fake e-cards.



The raw statistics (both CSV and Graphed) can be found in the usual place on my site. If you feel you need access then please contact me to discuss.

If we look at the overall growth of malware in 2007, it grew from 222,473 [as at the end of 2006] to 275,995 at the end of June. That's a growth of 53,522 new malware strains and/or variants in the first half of 2007, in June the number jumped by over 10,000. If I extrapolate this my guesstimate for the growth in malware in 2007 would be just over 107,044. Things have certainly speeded up during the second quarter of 2007!

What's New?
Instead of including commentary here about things I have already written about, I will offer links to other blog entries that may be of interest, topical, or cover some of the interesting occurrences in May 2007.


Conclusions:
The current trend of using social-engineering which has been widespread in January - May has continued in June, if anything it has accelerated.

We have seen another rise in the level of spam during June and this may have dented the figures for both 419s, Phishes and Malware arriving via e-mail, only time will tell.

The Phishers have been busy both with new versions of their scams, but also trying to recruit new 'staff' to launder the proceeds of their criminal activity [as can be seen in the article I have included in this months report]. It seems that they have more material [stolen accounts/credentials/credit card data] than they can handle, which is both gratifying [as they can't deal with more than a percentage of what they have acquired] and worrying [that they have managed to amass so much personal/financial data in the first place].

Another trend which has made itself very obvious during the first half of the year is that of the malware authors relying on social engineering to get victims to infect their computers, rather than having to use exploit code or include mass-mailing or other infection routines into their creations.

The final trend I wish to mention that has become prevalent this year, and ties up with the social engineering comments above, is that the malware authors and cyber-criminals are increasing their use of web sites to hold their malware and sending e-mails that contain nothing more than a link to it. In many cases this is not just a single web site, but can be as many as 10,000.

Looks like we could be in for a very interesting second half of the year!

Links:

Labels: , , , , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Friday, 20 July 2007

Surf or Turf? The Verdicts Are In!

Here's a follow-up to my 'Surf or Turf' posting which challenged you to work out whether ten screen shots of e-mails I had received were from who they claim to be from [Turf - The Real Beef] or from imposters [Surf - A Phoul Phish]?

So, to recap and to give any of you out there one final chance to take the challenge, here they are again:

Mug shot 1: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 2: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 3: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 4: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 5: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 6: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 7: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 8: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 9: Surf or Turf?



And last but not least....

Mug shot 10: Surf or Turf?



Your answers should be in the following format:

Mug Shot x [1-10] is [Surf|Turf]



SPOILER WARNING - DO NOT PROCEED BELOW THIS LINE - UNLESS YOU WANT TO KNOW THE ANSWERS

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!






For those of you that sent me your detective work or were brave enough to leave your findings/guesses as comments instead, I'd like to say thank you for joining in.

For those that took part, and those of you who didn't [shame on you! ;-)] here are the answers, and the pointers to show why it is Surf or Turf.:

  • Mug shot 1:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Did you notice the spelling mistakes and grammatical errors?

  • Mug shot 2:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Did you notice the spelling mistakes, grammatical errors and unusual choice of font?

  • Mug shot 3:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Threats and tight deadlines, dated 1987 and from 'Lana Staton'.

  • Mug shot 4:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Did you notice the grammatical errors and the technical update?

  • Mug shot 5:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Did you notice the grammatical errors and the technical update?

  • Mug shot 6:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Did you notice the odd phrasing and grammatical errors?

  • Mug shot 7:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Did you notice the odd phrasing and grammatical errors?

  • Mug shot 8:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Did you notice the grammatical errors and the technical update?

  • Mug shot 9:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Threats and tight deadlines, validation required once a month.

  • Mug shot 10:.: The Verdict :. 'Surf' - Threats and tight deadlines.


So, yes they were all 'Surf' after all, well done to those of you that correctly worked it out.

As some of you mentioned the URLs shown in the screenshots of the e-mails usually did not go to the same place they say they would. Of all of the ones I used for this challenge, number 6 was the most convincing and number 3 would have probably fooled some of you until the threat at the end and the date error.

Are you up for another challenge some time?

BTW, did any of you check out the 'McAfee SiteAdvisor Phishing Challenge'. If you did and scored 8 or more then consider yourself a 'Phishing' sleuth.

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Thursday, 19 July 2007

Have You Been Invited?

How many of you out there in 'Blogland' use eBay?

Of those that do or have used eBay, how many of you have been either taken for a ride by the 'Seller' and have never received the goods you payed for or have been supplied faulty, damaged or counterfeit goods?

Now, how many of you are or have been invited to become a 'PowerSeller'?

Well, I got the following e-mail recently:



Because I hardly ever use eBay and therefore I'm not eligible to become a power-seller, I was, not surprisingly rather suspicious [more than usual, anyway ;-)] of the e-mail. Having clicked on the link I was taken to here:



Well, it looks like the eBay site, uses the same fonts, template, logo, etc. But, guess what?

It is a 'fake', this is a site trying to use social-engineering to get you to disclose your eBay credentials; logon details in this case, so the 'Bad Guys and Girls' can mis-use it.

So, after all this, the e-mail was actually a 'Phishing' scam, so all you eBayers out there be careful not to fall for this.

BTW, I get many other more normal eBay Phishing scam e-mails as well.

So, another question for you all, "Do you feel safe using eBay and do you think that eBay take security seriously enough?" [Yes, I know that this is effectively two questions, not one.]

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Tuesday, 17 July 2007

Alliance & Leicester Phish

Continuing the recent 'Phishing' theme, here is an example of just one of the many 'Alliance & Leicester' phishing e-mails that are currently arriving in their hundreds at my personal mail server:



And if you are foolish/brave enough to click on the link, this is what you will see in your web browser:



Usual fare for the Phishers, they want your personal details so that they can steal money from your account or use the details to open new accounts or credit arrangements in your name, so when they default on the loan, you'll be the one being hassled or taken to court for non-payment.

If you are unwise enough to enter your 'real' details and click on the 'Click to Confirm' button at the bottom right corner, then you will be taken from the 'phishy' Alliance & Leicester site to the 'real' Alliance & Leicester site, none the wiser that you have been 'phished'.



Meanwhile your credit rating will nose-dive, and it will take you weeks, months or even years to recover from the effects. All because you were 'phooled by a phish'.

So, if you are up for a challenge then check out the 'McAfee SiteAdvisor Phishing Challenge'. At least with that one you won't end up losing any personal details and you might learn a thing or two in the process.

While you are there, why not install the free SiteAdvisor plugin, you'll be somewhat safer while browsing than without it.

BTW, I report all the phishing, malware and spam sites I see each and everyday to SiteAdvisor, see if you can work out which reporter I am? ;-)

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Monday, 16 July 2007

3 Million Pound T-Mobile Lottery Win!

Wow, look at this e-mail I've just been sent. According to it I've won THREE MILLION POUNDS!



So, it claims to have come from 'T-Mobile International Lottery', but on closer inspection it has actually come from a 'Hotmail' account. Obviously things are getting tough at 'T-Mobile' if they can't afford to run their own mail servers and domains anymore, but they can afford to give me THREE MILLION POUNDS as a prize? Doesn't add up, does it?

OK, I'll let you in to a secret, there is no such lottery, there is no 'THREE MILLION POUNDS' waiting for me (more's the pity ;-)) Yes, the e-mail is nothing more than another variant of the 419 Lottery scam which I've covered many times before on this blog.

This one isn't as ingenious as the one I blogged about on Friday, but it is a good try and people will get sucked in and believe that they have won a large pile of money, so you have been warned. As I often state "If something seems too good to be true, it probably is [too good to be true]". In other words "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch!"

Talking of lunch, I hope you enjoy/enjoyed yours?

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Friday, 13 July 2007

Scam Victims Compensation Payments

Oh joy! I just had the following e-mail drop into my e-mail client, it has made my day. Read it all and I'll think you'll agree that it is a wonderful e-mail for anyone to receive, especially anyone that has been the victim of scammers.



Isn't it a wonderful e-mail?

What a lovely new twist from the 'Boys and Girls from Lagos' to try on potential victims. Yes, if you haven't already 'sussed', the e-mail is nothing more than the latest from those criminals who run the '419 scams' [aka Nigerian scams or Advanced Fee Fraud scams].

As usual there is NO MONEY, anyone falling for this would actually lose money, possibly lots of it, or worse their liberty or life!

For those of you that are not 'clued-up' on '419 scams', I'd suggest reading two articles I've had published in the ''Virus Bulletin' magazine. Links below:


Have a pleasent and safe weekend.

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Wednesday, 11 July 2007

Have You Got Anything Without Spam?

Sounds like a line from the 'Monty Python' SPAM sketch], doesn't it? In fact it is.

Why am I using this quote from that infamous sketch? Well, because it is almost getting to the point with e-mails [over 90% of e-mails that arrive at my personal mail server are spam] and the many file formats that end up as e-mail attachments containing spam, where it would be quicker to ask "Have You Got Anything Without Spam?" Let me explain:

Back in September 2006 I discussed the latest techniques used by the spammers [on my old blogging host], these included, image, ASCII, HTML and Word document spam. I suggested then that the spammers would find other file formats to use to contain their 'crud'. Lo and behold, they have done just that.

Over the last few weeks we've seen another file format used that many people 'trust', this being the oh so popular 'PDF' (Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format).

Here's a screen shot of what we saw in a typical image spam, until recently, the spammers have simply placed their spammy image into a 'PDF' file to try and defeat anti-spam defenses. Guess what? It worked!



However, as what happened when we first saw the spammers using Microsoft Word document files to place their spammy text in, we are now seeing the same thing happening with the new 'PDF' spam, as you can see from the complex example below:



Not all the new 'PDF' spam is as complex a the example above, or designed to fool anti-spam tools which use OCR techniques to read text in image files, Word documents or PDF files, as the final example below clearly shows:



So, how much spam is now being sent in 'PDF' attachments via e-mail? Well to put it simply; lots! The screen shot below shows just part of one of my e-mail folders 'packed-to-the-gills' with only 'PDF' based spam.



"What's next?" I hear you ask. Well, as mentioned back in September 2006:

"Unfortunately, we are seeing a similar 'arms-race' in the spam and anti-spam arena that we have been living with in the malware and anti-malware arena for the last two decades. You can bet that we will see other file formats being used by spammers, and we may also see them starting to use some of these file formats to not only get their spam through our defenses, but also, I fear, to use them to drop malware/spyware onto unsuspecting users systems. We may also see the spammers start to use exploit code to infiltrate systems and turn them into spam relays or to install keyloggers to steal financial or other personal or commercial data."

Sometimes, just sometimes, I really hate being right!

Luckily the 'Bad Guys and Girls' behind most of the spamming activity haven't yet decided to place malicious content, attachments or links in these 'PDF' or Word document spam, however, I suspect that this will happen sooner or later, so be very careful if you plan to open such spam, as you might get more than you bargained for....

Now, how does the chorus the 'Vikings' sing go? Oh yes, I know:

"Spam spam spam spam. Lovely spam! Wonderful spam! Spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam spa-a-a-a-a-am spam. Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Lovely spam! Spam spam spam spam!"

All together now: "I don't like spam!"

I would be interested in just how much spam you, dear reader[s]*, are receiving at personal e-mail [not work] addresses that you have. Use the comment option to leave your findings/thoughts, as that is what it is there for.


* Hopefully there is more than just one reader of this blog, two perhaps? ;-)

Labels: ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Tuesday, 10 July 2007

How Not To Spam

Here is an interesting case I came across last month, the reason it is interesting is not because it was spam, it was what the spammer spammed out.

Curious to know what it was?

Was it:
  1. 'Porn'

  2. 'Stock Pump and Dump'

  3. 'Phishing'

  4. '419'

  5. 'Fake E-Card'

  6. 'Pills, Potions or Patches'

  7. 'Loans'

  8. 'OEM or Pirated Software'

  9. 'Malware'

  10. 'Something Else'

In most normal spam runs, the spam sent out in their thousands or hundreds of thousands contain one or more of the items above. It is also often the case nowadays that those that send spam are 'professionals' rather than the 'amateurs' that have been responsible for the vast amount of the 'stuff' that ended up in our e-mail inboxes up to the end of 2003.

These new breed of spammers use tools and botnets to automate the creation and distribution of their, or their customers 'crud'. You didn't think it is sent out by a human being one piece at a time, did you?

So, it is most 'gratifying' to see that these 'professional spammers' are after all, human, and like all humans they are prone to make mistakes. Below are two screen shots of the spam e-mail I received during June which I found to be most heartwarming, and raised a wry smile and a small chuckle:




For those of you that don't recognize the content in the e-mail contained in the screen shots above, what you see is not the usual spam e-mail contents but the configuration file for the tool that the spammer was trying to use to send out his spam, talk about ironic! ;-)

I wonder if the spammer [the dirty rat] responsible for this 'unprofessional' spam run was paid a visit by his customer or 'The Boss' or his 'Enforcers'? Maybe he was 'roughed-up' a bit, got 'knee-capped', or woke up and found a 'horses-head' in bed with him or took a 'swim with the fishes'?

Yes, most of the spammers do now work for 'organised crime syndicates', so the above suggestions are not that far fetched! ;-)

Labels: ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Monday, 9 July 2007

Fake Malware Alert E-mails

It seems that the so-called 'Storm-Worm Gang' has decided to change their social engineering approach again, originally they used fake [and real] news items to get potential victims to infect their computers, they then moved on to using 'Fake e-card notifications' [which I've blogged about several times over the last week or so]. They have now decided to try a new approach [for them anyway], this being using warning e-mails that claim your computer is infected with a virus, worm or trojan.

This is what they tend to look like at the time of writing this:

'Virus' Variant Screen Shot:


'Worm' Variant Screen Shot:


As you can hopefully see these e-mails do not have any attachments, instead they include a link to where the fake 'patch' is hosted. The patch is not a patch at all, but malware. At the time of writing this the malware hosted was a new variant of Tibs, however this will almost certainly be changed over the next week, at least once, maybe more often. This enables the 'Bad Guys and Girls' to evade [or try to] any anti-malware defences that you may have in place.

So far I've seen the following subject lines used:

  • Alert!

  • ATTN!

  • Trojan Detected!

  • Virus Activity Detected!

  • Virus Alert!

  • Virus Detected!

  • Warning!

  • Worm Activity Detected!

  • Worm Alert!

  • Worm Detected!

And they have used the following from names [along with random e-mail addresses]:

  • Abuse Team Robot

  • Administrator

  • Customer Support

  • Customer Support Center

  • Mailer-Deamon

  • Postmaster

Expect these e-mails to mutate over the next week or so before the 'Storm-Worm Gang' change tack once more.

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Friday, 6 July 2007

RBS Phish Run

Continuing the current 'Phishing' theme, here is an example of just one of the many RBS phishing e-mails that are currently arriving in their hundreds at my personal mail server:



And if you are foolish/brave enough to click on the link, this is what you will see in your web browser:



Usual fare for the Phishers, they want your personal details so that they can steal money from your account or use the details to open new accounts or credit arrangements in your name, so when they default on the loan, you'll be the one being hassled or taken to court for non-payment.

If you are unwise enough to enter your 'real' details and click on the 'Confirm & Exit' link at the bottom right corner, then you will be taken from the 'phishy' RBS site to the 'real' RBS site, none the wiser that you have been 'phished'.



Meanwhile your credit rating will nose-dive, and it will take you weeks, months or even years to recover from the effects. All because you were 'phooled by a phish'.

So, if you are up for a challenge then check out my 'Surf or Turf' posting. At least with my challenge you won't end up losing any personal details and you might learn a thing or two in the process.

Labels: ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Thursday, 5 July 2007

Surf or Turf?

I have set several challenges over the last six months on this blog, and I think it is time for a new one. So, as Phishing is one of the major problems at the moment I thought that it would make a good challenge, hope you agree?

Below are ten screen shots of e-mails I have received, are they from who they claim to be from [Turf - The Real Beef] are or they from imposters [Surf - A Phoul Phish]?

Mug shot 1: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 2: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 3: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 4: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 5: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 6: Surf or Turf?






Mug shot 7: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 8: Surf or Turf?



Mug shot 9: Surf or Turf?



And last but not least....

Mug shot 10: Surf or Turf?



Your answers should be in the following format:

Mug Shot x [1-10] is [Surf|Turf]

Those of you who are brave enough are welcome to leave your answers as feedback to this entry, anyone that would prefer to e-mail their answers to me can do so using the following e-mail address: Phish-Quiz at arachnid.homeip.net [replace ' at ' with '@']

Now chow down and bon appetit!

I'll post a summary [names withheld] of the results after the closing date for submissions, which will be the 19th of July 2007. Oh, and I'll post the answers at the same time too! ;-)

Labels: ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Wednesday, 4 July 2007

Independence Day Greetings

A new wave of e-card notification e-mails which use the American Independence Day as a theme has been circulating overnight, these are the subject lines I've seen so far:

  • 4th Of July Celebration

  • American Pride, On The 4th

  • America's 231st Birthday

  • Americas B-Day

  • America the Beautiful

  • Celebrate Your Independence

  • Celebrate Your Nation

  • Fireworks on The 4th

  • Fourth of July Party

  • God Bless America

  • Happy 4th of July

  • Happy B-Day USA

  • Happy Birthday America

  • Happy Fourth of July

  • Independence Day At The Park

  • Independence Day Celebration

  • Independence Day Party

  • July 4th B-B-Q Party

  • July 4th Family Day

  • July 4th Fireworks Show

  • Your Nations Birthday

And here is a screen shot of one of the latest versions:



So far all the links [that work] show the same web content as the screenshot from my original article on e-cards [Watch Out, Watch Out, There's an E-card About!]. However, it may well change at some point.

By all means enjoy the holiday, but don't let your common sense take a break too.

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page

Tuesday, 3 July 2007

Watch Out, Watch Out, There's an E-card About!

As some of you may have noticed we are seeing a massive campaign by the 'Bad Guys and Girls' who are using social engineering techniques via fake e-card notification e-mails. Here is a screenshot of just part of one of the e-mail folders I have full of these e-mails:



Here's a screenshot of what just one of these look like now:



Oh, it is nice to be worshipped ;-). I've had ones that claim to come from a:

  • Class-Mate

  • Colleague

  • Family Member

  • Friend

  • Mate

  • Neighbor

  • Neighbour

  • Partner

  • School-Mate

  • School Friend

  • Worshipper

They claim to come from many 'real' e-card sites, such as:

  • 123Greetings.com

  • 2000Greetings.com

  • All-Yours.net

  • AmericamGreetings.com

  • Bluemountain.com

  • DGreetings.com

  • E-Cards.com

  • Freewebcards.com

  • Funnypostcard.com

  • Greet2k.com

  • Greeting-cards.com

  • Hallmark.com

  • ILoveCards.com

  • Mypostcards.com

  • NetFunCards.com

  • Postcards.com

  • Postcards.org

  • Riversongs.com

  • VintagePostcards.com

Of course, when you click on the link you go to another site, not the one you expect to go to. Here's a screenshot of one of the web pages you could end up on if you click on the link in one of these 'fake e-card' e-mails.



Yeah right, 'testing a new browser feature', sure they are! What they are doing is running exploit code, and if that fails they can always use social engineering to get the visitor to the site to infect their own computer by clicking on the link and running the file.

Before that the fake e-card e-mails looked like this:



And in one wave they turned rather messy, sort of a 'everything-but-ther-kitchen-sink' variant ;-):



What a mess, eh?

In a rather 'twilight zone' moment, last month I wrote an article on the use of HTML based e-mail and the use of e-cards [fake ones] by the 'Bad Guys and Girls' for the Virus Bulletin magazine; this was before the latest attacks started....most spooky.

The article has just been published in the July issue, so no, the 'Bad Guys and Girls' didn't use the data and other information contained in the article I wrote for VB. I will make a copy of the article available early next month here. Many thanks to VB for allowing me to do this.

The main problem with the recent waves of fake e-card e-mails we have been seeing is that the link to the 'fake e-card' takes you to is often a website that contains the following payloads that can automatically infect your computer just by visiting it with a system that isn't fully patched:

  • Various Browser Exploits.

  • Various Windows Exploits.

  • A download [fake e-card] which is actually malware.

As I've often mentioned here, the 'Bad Guys and Girls' seem to be using social engineering as their primary tool to try and get you to infect your own computer, so be very careful and make sure your system is fully patched and protected if you must let curiosity get the better of you.....don't make their job easier.

Labels: , ,

Digg! Slashdot Slashdot It! Save This Page